<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Palantir on Vonng</title><link>https://vonng.com/en/tags/palantir/</link><description>Recent content in Palantir on Vonng</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>rh@vonng.com (Ruohang Feng)</managingEditor><webMaster>rh@vonng.com (Ruohang Feng)</webMaster><copyright>© 2025 Ruohang Feng</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vonng.com/en/tags/palantir/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>After the Debate, Let's Talk Seriously About 'Ontology'</title><link>https://vonng.com/en/db/ontology-again/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><author>rh@vonng.com (Ruohang Feng)</author><guid>https://vonng.com/en/db/ontology-again/</guid><description>Palantir&amp;rsquo;s Ontology is, technically, data modeling. The more interesting question is how a philosophy term got repurposed to market system integration and data modeling, and why that story is so likely to turn into another round of concept inflation in China&amp;rsquo;s tech ecosystem.</description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://vonng.com/db/ontology-again/featured.webp"/></item></channel></rss>